How to use this tool?
This free online converter lets you convert code from Scheme to Haskell in a click of a button. To use this converter, take the following steps -
- Type or paste your Scheme code in the input box.
- Click the convert button.
- The resulting Haskell code from the conversion will be displayed in the output box.
Examples
The following are examples of code conversion from Scheme to Haskell using this converter. Note that you may not always get the same code since it is generated by an AI language model which is not 100% deterministic and gets updated from time to time.
Example 1 - Is String Palindrome
Program that checks if a string is a palindrome or not.
Scheme
Haskell
Example 2 - Even or Odd
A well commented function to check if a number if odd or even.
Scheme
Haskell
Key differences between Scheme and Haskell
Characteristic | Scheme | Haskell |
---|---|---|
Syntax | Scheme has a simple and minimalist syntax, with a heavy use of parentheses and prefix notation. | Haskell has a more complex syntax compared to Scheme, with a mix of infix and prefix notation. |
Paradigm | Scheme is a multi-paradigm language, supporting both functional and imperative programming. | Haskell is a purely functional language, focusing on functional programming paradigms. |
Typing | Scheme is dynamically typed, allowing for flexible and dynamic programming. | Haskell is statically typed, providing strong type checking and compile-time guarantees. |
Performance | Scheme is generally considered to have good performance, but it can be slower than languages with more optimized compilers. | Haskell is known for its strong performance, thanks to its advanced compiler optimizations. |
Libraries and frameworks | Scheme has a smaller ecosystem of libraries and frameworks compared to Haskell. | Haskell has a rich ecosystem of libraries and frameworks, making it easier to find existing solutions for various tasks. |
Community and support | Scheme has a smaller community compared to Haskell, but it still has active users and support. | Haskell has a vibrant and active community, with extensive support and resources available. |
Learning curve | Scheme has a relatively low learning curve, especially for programmers familiar with Lisp-like languages. | Haskell has a steeper learning curve, requiring a deeper understanding of functional programming concepts. |