Online Haxe to Nim Converter
Click to select or drop your input code file here.
You can also type the input code below.
How to use this tool?
This free online converter lets you convert code from Haxe to Nim in a click of a button. To use this converter, take the following steps -
- Type or paste your Haxe code in the input box.
- Click the convert button.
- The resulting Nim code from the conversion will be displayed in the output box.
Key differences between Haxe and Nim
| Characteristic | Haxe | Nim |
|---|---|---|
| Syntax | C-like syntax, similar to JavaScript, ActionScript, and Java; designed to be familiar to web and application developers. | Python-like syntax, indentation-based, concise and readable; designed for clarity and expressiveness. |
| Paradigm | Multi-paradigm: supports object-oriented, functional, and generic programming. | Multi-paradigm: supports procedural, object-oriented, functional, and metaprogramming. |
| Typing | Statically typed with type inference; supports dynamic typing via 'Dynamic' type. | Statically typed with type inference; strong and safe typing, but allows some dynamic features. |
| Performance | Performance depends on target platform; can be high when targeting C++, Java, or native platforms, but may be limited by target VM or JS engine. | Compiles to efficient C, C++, or JavaScript; generally offers performance close to C/C++ for native targets. |
| Libraries and frameworks | Has cross-platform libraries (e.g., OpenFL, Kha) and can use target platform libraries; ecosystem is smaller than mainstream languages. | Growing standard library and third-party packages (Nimble); can use C libraries easily via FFI, but ecosystem is still maturing. |
| Community and support | Active but relatively small community; good documentation and some commercial support, especially in game development. | Smaller but enthusiastic community; improving documentation and support, mostly community-driven. |
| Learning curve | Moderate; familiar syntax for those with C-style language experience, but cross-compilation concepts may add complexity. | Gentle for those familiar with Python; some learning curve for metaprogramming and advanced features. |
Try our other free tools
Try our ready to use converters using the links below
Convert from C++
Convert from Golang
Convert from Java
Convert from JavaScript
Convert from Python
Convert from R
Convert from C
Convert from Csharp
Convert from Julia
Convert from Perl
Convert from Matlab
Convert from Kotlin
Convert from PHP
Convert from Ruby
Convert from Rust
Convert from TypeScript
Convert from Lua
Convert from SAS
Convert from Fortran
Convert from Lisp
Convert from Scala
Convert from Assembly
Convert from ActionScript
Convert from Clojure
Convert from CoffeeScript
Convert from Dart
Convert from COBOL
Convert from Elixir
Convert from Groovy
Convert from Erlang
Convert from Haskell
Convert from Pascal
Convert from Swift
Convert from Scheme
Convert from Racket
Convert from OCaml
Convert from Elm
Convert from Haxe
Convert from Crystal
Convert from Fsharp
Convert from Tcl
Convert from VB.NET
Convert from Objective_C
Convert from Ada
Convert from Vala
Convert from PySpark
Convert from SQL
Convert from VB6
Convert from VBA
Convert from VBScript
Convert from PowerShell
Convert from Bash
Convert from Delphi
Convert from Zig
Convert from Carbon
Convert from Nim
Convert from Grain
Convert from Gleam
Convert from Wren
Convert from PostgreSQL
Convert from MySQL
Convert from MongoDB
Convert from CQL
Convert from Redis
Convert from Elasticsearch